FIRST OprahRules just to be clear I was not the person who had suggested the "S" thing and as for knowing things the site does allow twitter. That answer to the question as to how I came to know what happened. As for Aloenfly having it in for me I will never know, but that is his problem. The comments you have made could very easily be considered insults based on things you are not aware of.
I know the rules of the site and at the same time I believe if a member on the site can offer any performer some help then just go for it. It is often called doing a good deed and the satisfaction comes from the smile on the performer's face when things work out. Hope this clears things up for you regarding this matter.

Well first off, I don't how you concluded that there were insults in any of what I said, because I was literally just stating clearly observable facts with respect to the way you have always unconditionally attempted to doubt members in favor of models regardless of what is being reported. This isn't "based on things I am not aware of," as it is all very well-documented right here in the forums for anyone who can read. This is just the way you operate here so you shouldn't be surprised when people doubt your motives/credibility --- I also remember you from the nasty arguments you had with everyone else this past summer over a model getting canceled for deplorable behavior. As with every other situation, you have only heard one side of this story, which seems to be the only side you're ever interested in considering (the model's side), and you act like their version *must* be 100% accurate. Since you claim not to be involved in the "S" proposition, you actually have no way of knowing what really transpired, even if you were in contact the model. If they want back onto the site, OF COURSE they're not just going to tell another member that they were 100% flouting the rules, even if they were. Of course they're going to tell you a story that makes them sound innocent if they hope you will try to get them back on... what else would you expect? That doesn't mean they're telling the truth. I somehow don't buy the whole 'they were just joking around and having fun and said yes to "S" but were never really gonna do it' spin. Apparently the site agrees. Flirt4Free said that they reviewed the case carefully before coming to whatever decision they made, so I would assume they have pretty solid evidence to back up their decision to kick the model off their site, especially given how permissive Flirt4Free can be when it come to models flouting the rules a lot of times. I guess I am just much more inclined to trust the site over your one-sided, hear-say account of the situation given completely from the model's retelling of what transpired. You really expect this to be taken seriously?
Quote