1. No one is naming the names of these G4P models so it's not like they are publicly shunned.
2. For some people, it's important to have the appearance of a connection with model. That's why people are here and not just watching porn.
3. I have found a few G4P models from all the studios. I avoid them too. I have just found that BA seems to have the highest proportion.
4. I don't think the studios or the models should be dishonest in their profiles. If someone is straight, list them as such. Everyone appreciates honesty.
1. You do not need names when you are publicly shunning the studio, basically saying all who work for the studio should be shunned including those you like to visit.
2. yes I agree, but the connection is made through meeting the model and getting to know them not through reading profiles and reviews.
3. Again, only one studio is being listed. All studios and non-studio models should be included that fall into this category if it is a public complaint.
4. Honesty is always appreciated, but I have yet to find one profile on this whole site that is honest. Whether it is sexual orientation, location, birthdate, ethnicity, etc. I have seen falsehoods in all of them. Do yo come to visit the profiles or the model.
All I am saying is that every little complaint seems to turn into an extreme lumping individual into a category that will pull others into the complaint that is unwarranted. I see the extremes everyday in regards to "'The gays", "'The Whites", "The Blacks", "The Republicans", "'The Democrats", etc. These are all people working to make a living and every negative and positive comment will have an effect, even a trickle of one, on their livelihood. The studios and flirt are making money and they do not care what is written in these forums and most of the models never see let alone read anything in the forums. Yet every little complaint will start a biased opinion on those members reading them and they might never visit a model they might have built a relationship with.
Quote